I inserted it into a brand new PC to offload the files from it, I kid you not it froze and locked up my entire PC. Turguy Goker I understand the potential issues; however if you have the capability collecting SMART data from the 47K+ some drives, the data I am suggesting might be useful to analyze All rights reserved. The large data files make for large data sets to work on, but if you give it a try, please let us know if you find anything interesting.
The 1996 Toshiba died in a similar manner after the laptop fell during an attempted robbery but here as well I was able to recuperate all the data on it. Since there was no tracking of the origin of the Seagate drives, bare drive vs ripped out of enclosure, there is no way to determine this. The DeskStars had one unfortunate circumstance and the stigma/jokes last forever. AFR of 15% suggests that about 150 out of each 1000 will fail each year.
Out of all the drives mentioned in this list, the only that has failed in normal use and form old age was the Quantum, that had been used in a Windows Reliability of Hard Drive Brands Losing a disk drive at Backblaze is not a big deal. Awesome. Hitachi Hard Drive Tools RAID 5, IMO, is the only option for an enthusiast to backup large amounts of data without breaking the bank.
Deeper; Eg. The system is undergoing into a rebuild due to drive failure and encounters another one so it’s out of RAID6 protection parities. e.g. Clicking Here Bill McKenzie I think you have this backwards.
Rman87 Based on my experience, I dont see the seagates fail till more like the 3 year point and by four is when you see them dropping like flies. Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016 Tech1ceTech2ce Sorry should have clarified. SSDs and Hybrid Drives are the best drives now. The failure rate may been the piss poor cooling on the dell case, or some other anomaly.
Hgst Vs Wd
I have a Dell Ultrabook 15z that was about 4 months shy of its 4th year when the hard drive began failing. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-q4-2015/ The same principle is used in all manufacturing companies, the higher the specifications, the higher the qualifying and so goes the quality. Hgst External Hard Drive I'd probably have thought the same thing. Hitachi Hard Drives I miss the old Samsung drives, Segate gives them a bad name now.
You'll get a DOA hard drive on any manufacturer, but out of the hundreds of Black's I've ordered, none have been DOA or died as far as I know. The surprising (and bad) news is that Seagate 3.0TB drives are failing a lot more, with their failure rate jumping from 9% to 15%. I use two external USB drives to backup the same stuff - bit of an over-kill but once bitten twice shy! Tipografia Romania libera No way, the failure rate of a mechanical drive is not linear after the burn-in period. Hitachi Hard Drive Support
Scratching seagate off my purchase list permenantly. I just went to my Dads house and hooked up a USB drive to his router and then I got offsite storage for my server. http://www.zaxtor.net ZaXtOr Longest lasting HD I had was my old 6.4GB Fujitsu was 1999 ~ ???? That philosophy says "Why buy a $400 drive to do the same work that a $100 drive can do?" Nothing like watching your bonus vanish and your CAPEX budget go down
Here's a link to the class action article.. Seagate Vs Western Digital External Hard Drive Peter Novák This is an excellent point. they focus their engineering to prevent in the designed use case the significantly early failure of any one of the components relative to the others.
Long story short, I had to put a Linux server in my basement.
Is it well-judged that I should focus mostly for HGST/Hitachi drives? Switch the Ultra DMA mode. I've seen more Western Digital drives die than any other make by far. Hitachi Hard Drive Firmware J.
Drashna Milk, thank you for making my point. They don't care about reliability and integrity, so why the HELL would I trust my data with them?! One 8TB HGST drive failed during Q4 of 2015. The recycle dumpster were full of them.
They've lasted years for me & are rock solid. If you attempt to boot up from such drive or read any data from it you would get "Primary Master Hard Disk Fail", "No operating system found", "USB Device malfunctioned" error, including hybrid DezzNutz Well, guess I will stay with WD and not Seagate, even though WD practices deception and false advertising. Each day a drive is listed it counts as one drive-day for that hard drive.
I do have a, hmmm…. The Seagate Desktop HDD.15 has a 3% failure, and the Western Digital Red has an 8.8% failure. If they weren't HP, Dell, EMC, NetApp wouldn't use them in their products. I've taken the data up through Q2 (haven't done the Q3 data) and processed it to put all the failures and suspensions together for the individual hard drive models and then
Jonathan Mager Personally I go with Western Digital as they were just the first company I randomly chose to buy my first Hard Drive. Ray Tuholski 4 9's is not terribly reliable for enterprise needs…. Compatible only with x86-based processors. linkdude31 No WD Enterprise (RD or SE) or Black drives tested…what?
It's nice to see your efforts apparently have spanked Seagate to get their quality in line with the competition!! All OEM manufactures develop their own standards and qualifications for all OEM equipment that goes into their products. New unused ones did not do that. calmdownbro Had tons of drives in my desktops and laptops, servers, literally all the form factors.
Personally, I buy 7200 RPM Seagate drives for my personal system and I haven't seen the failure rate that Black Blaze identified. I too am in the same boat. I've worked closely with several companies with IT departments that managed hundreds of computers. TL;DR WD drives are bollocks.
Different work loads, different behavior. Number of Hard Drives by Model at Backblaze Model Size Number of Drives Average Age in years Annual Failure Rate Seagate Desktop HDD.15 (ST4000DM000) 4.0TB 9619 0.6 3.0% HGST Deskstar 7K2000 Then, you might also expect a shorter life expectancy of the replacement drive as well.