It is, however, fully hardware accelerated for DirectSound and EAX 4 and was sold as a cheaper companion for the more expensive ZS. Login _ Social Sharing Find TechSpot on... Re: DAC (Score:3) by TimTucker ( 982832 ) writes: Not sure if they make any now, but Aopen used to make a motherboard with vacuum tubes for sound:http://www.neoseeker.com/Artic... [neoseeker.com] Re:No. (Score:5, Many hifi rigs are hooked up into digital inputs, many TVs and computer displays will support HDMI audio and do the conversion in the device. have a peek here
However, the volume for headphones is never high enough even with the volume control maxed out in Windows. However, it uses the same audio DSP and is functionally as capable as the Audigy 2 and 4 series (other than Audigy 2 SE). Fistofoo your last point is correct and shows that your not just spreading FUD around... Get the answer jag64551Feb 15, 2012, 3:05 AM Cool, thanks fistoffooFeb 15, 2012, 4:16 AM I have the Sound Blaster Audigy SE and it is much much much cleaner and crisper http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/audigy-or-analog-qaulity-noise-from-sblive.3502/
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs
the "old" card will do much better sound if you get it to work! storage became vast enough, combined with audio compression, it made more sense to just pre-record all your audio effects and music and play them back through a basic DSP. You can check their website.
We've reached "good enough" 15+ years ago. It'll be great for my collection of 128 Kbps MP3s! Of note is that Creative hardware is not necessary for this device. Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs Drivers Windows 7 I'm planning to install it in my newer Win 7 pc, but must use an adapter for the motherboard, as new comp does not have PCI slot.
Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:No. (Score:4, Interesting) by mjwalshe ( 1680392 ) writes: on Thursday July 10, 2014 @04:47PM (#47427455) on-board tends to have problems with noise - a problem Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs Windows 10 Basically any DAC, barring a messed up implementation, is likely to sound sonically transparent to any other in a normal system. Onboard sound will prob be better. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/326644-28-should-onboard-sounds-older-sound-blaster-audigy That puts you above the low-end SoundBlasters, and within spitting distance of the high-end ones.
the "old" card will do much better sound if you get it to work! Sound Blaster Audigy Se I would be surprised if this Soundblaster could justify its price in a proper double blind study on real world data (music, games, movies, etc...) vs. Via Envy24 codes and Wolfson DACs are the preferred combination, and cards with them cost under a tenner.Much better to spend the money on better speakers or a headphone amp. Similar Topics Audigy 2 Popping noise - Not a Speaker Problem Aug 24, 2006 Poll: Audigy -or- Extigy ?
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs Windows 10
the general purpose CPU became powerful enough to do any complex signal processing and simply use the basic DSP to output the results of the processing.Basically, in my opinion, specialize hardware http://arstechnica.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=132558 Unless you had one of major 'good' cards (Soundblaster, Gravis ultrasound, and one or two others) old games wouldn't have sound at all. Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs This fact was not immediately obvious in Creative's literature, and was difficult to ascertain even upon examination of the Audigy's spec sheets. (A resulting class-action settlement with Creative later awarded US Sound Blaster Audigy Drivers Why not?
Once you get a color scope, you can clearly see that one signal is yellow and the other is red.http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/... [aliimg.com] Re:No. (Score:4, Interesting) by PIBM ( 588930 ) writes: on navigate here Retrieved 2016-07-17. ^ "Creative Worldwide Support". DJDeCiBeLAug 19, 2012, 12:21 PM hairystuff said: and talking about old audio equipment, I have got some old audio equipment, mainly amplifiers that are 25+ years old (harmon kardon and kenwood) Digital: 2.1 Sound Blaster Audigy LS The Sound Blaster Audigy LS (SB0310) is similar to the Audigy SE in that it supports neither hardware acceleration nor FireWire.  Sound Blaster Audigy Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs Manual Pdf
In my opinion, is is one of the last great Creative Labs discrete sound cards.I tried switching to the on-board sound in my latest build but I prefer the sound from However, the high-resolution audio was achieved by bypassing the DSP, being decoded directly by CA0151 chip also known as "p16v" to take advantage of which Creative substituted CA0102 for the old InvalidErrorAug 19, 2012, 12:59 PM rio747 said: I dont see any reason these cards should not still sound great, especially compared to onboard which is only slightly better than no sound. Check This Out cvanbrederodeOct 11, 2014, 1:34 AM To add my two cents, I've been using my Audigy2 ZS (Gamer flavor) more or less straight for the 13 years and I've never had problems
No new comments can be posted. Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Zs Platinum Pro Not even for gaming, thanks.Discreet card? Audigy 2's 3D audio capabilities received a boost when compared to its predecessors.
If you're an audiophile or using your system to do professional mixing or music then it is worth it.Even then, you're not going to be using a PCI Soundblaster card, but
mgvhJul 26, 2013, 7:10 AM Thanks for the update! Both are on Asus mobos and the one that sounds worse was on a much more expensive board, so go figure. My biggest issue with them is they are temperamental about bass. Sound Blaster Audigy Sb0090 Ask a question and give support.
Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:No. (Score:5, Insightful) by techno-vampire ( 666512 ) writes: on Thursday July 10, 2014 @06:10PM (#47428001) Homepage I believe the word you want is "audiophule." You Some onboard adapters also have issues with S/PDIF passthrough, e.g. Share twitter facebook linkedin My reason for using a sound card. (Score:2) by dohnut ( 189348 ) writes: I had the optical output on my motherboard run into my home theater this contact form Of course, the $35 Raspberry Pi supports HDMI CEC very well.
Dec 14, 2002 #2 Tweakster TS Enthusiast Topic Starter Posts: 199 Sorry but i been in London . Retrieved 2016-07-17. ^ Thon, Harald. "Audigy 2: Technical Details - A Prima Donna on PC: Creative Labs Audigy 2". They'll use the same amount of resources.My advice, try the onboard. You really only need to worry about a sound card if your PC is outputting ANALOG audio to HIGH QUALITY Amp & Speakers.
Creative has made the free VidCap application available on their website. It allows quick and easy capture and output to devices. whooleoFeb 15, 2012, 7:56 AM Try the sound card first it will sound better, but if drivers are an issue use onboard. And, given that VGA is analog, nois You're much better off investing in speakers (Score:5, Informative) by ZorinLynx ( 31751 ) writes: on Thursday July 10, 2014 @04:30PM (#47427293) Homepage Any Depends really where the Audigy focused its sound signature...
It is only missing its FireWire port. Sound Blaster Audigy SE & Audigy Value The Audigy SE and Audigy Value are stripped down models, with a less expensive CA0106 audio-controller in For digital output, neither Soundblaster has an advantage, and if (and only if) it is possible to change the S/PDIF sampling rate, they have that advantage over onboard. scheffkuhJan 17, 2014, 8:53 AM chaosgs said: Doubt a card that old will amount to anything. Every single Realtek chip I looked at supported this - probably not every implementation does, but it's something that doesn't cost the manufacturer any more than the cost of the connectors.
which are, by definition, discrete audio devices. MagicPantsFeb 15, 2012, 2:56 AM Short version: it won't matter.Longer version, the creative card will have a slightly better signal to noise ratio (106 db vs probably around 95db for onboard). If you look at the output on an oscilloscope, instead of a smooth wave, you see the actual steps.